IPC Section 111 - Liability of abettor when one act a betted and different act done

111. Liability of abettor when one act a betted and different act done. When an Act is abetted

and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent

as if he had directly abetted it:

Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the

influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the

abetment.

Illustration s

(a) A instigates a child to put pois on into the food of Z, and gives him poison for that purpose. The

child, in consequence of the instigation, by mistake puts the poison into the food of Y, which is by the

side of that of Z. Here, if the child was acting under the influence of A's instigati on, and the act done was

under the circumstances a probable consequence of the abetment, A is liable in the same manner and to

the same extent as if he had instigated the child to put the poison into the food of Y.

(b) A instigates B to burn Z 's house. B s ets fire to the house and at the same time commits theft of

property there. A, though guilty of abetting the burning of the house, is not guilty of abetting the theft; for

the theft was a distinct act, and not a probable consequence of the burning.

(c) A instigates B and C to break into an inhabited house at midnight for the purpose of robbery, and

provides them with arms for that purpose. B and C break into the house, and being resisted by Z, one of

the inmates, murder Z. Here, if that murder was the proba ble consequence of the abetment, A is liable to

the punishment provided for murder.